<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Branding in your tube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commons.iabc.com/branding/2006/04/25/branding-in-your-tube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commons.iabc.com/branding/2006/04/25/branding-in-your-tube/</link>
	<description>A Blog Community for Business Communicators</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angelo Fernando</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/branding/2006/04/25/branding-in-your-tube/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 23:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/branding/2006/04/25/branding-in-your-tube/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>You nailed it. Raw and unpoilshed seems to always win over the overly-branded and nicely-storyboarded. It's the style that a lot of advertising has begun to emulate as content moves from the old 'tubes' to the new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nailed it. Raw and unpoilshed seems to always win over the overly-branded and nicely-storyboarded. It&#8217;s the style that a lot of advertising has begun to emulate as content moves from the old &#8216;tubes&#8217; to the new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
