<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for IABC Communication Commons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commons.iabc.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commons.iabc.com</link>
	<description>A Blog Community for Business Communicators</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting on-topic by Mark Weiner</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/07/21/getting-on-topic/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 12:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/07/21/getting-on-topic/#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>Shel,

Carol Kinsey Goman's post is provactive and it directly affects the communication world, counter to what some of her critics say.  

The essential element is the big company's willingness to properly compensate for the new ideas they're gathering.  Unfortunately, some unethical companies -- but it tends to be big companies who represent a potential windfall for small companies, including PR and communication agencies -- get their creative and tactical ideas through either a formal RFP process or an open exploration only to replicate many or all of the best ideas with the low-price bidder.  

I've heard this complaint from agencies for years.

PS:  the trouble with posting to professional communicators is that everyone is an editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shel,</p>
<p>Carol Kinsey Goman&#8217;s post is provactive and it directly affects the communication world, counter to what some of her critics say.  </p>
<p>The essential element is the big company&#8217;s willingness to properly compensate for the new ideas they&#8217;re gathering.  Unfortunately, some unethical companies &#8212; but it tends to be big companies who represent a potential windfall for small companies, including PR and communication agencies &#8212; get their creative and tactical ideas through either a formal RFP process or an open exploration only to replicate many or all of the best ideas with the low-price bidder.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard this complaint from agencies for years.</p>
<p>PS:  the trouble with posting to professional communicators is that everyone is an editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication Measurement 101 by Mary</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-700</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-700</guid>
		<description>Check out Mark Weiner's new book published with IABC--chock full of case studies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Mark Weiner&#8217;s new book published with IABC&#8211;chock full of case studies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The CEOs role in Blogging by J. David Pincus</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/04/27/the-question-of-ceos-role-in-blogging/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>J. David Pincus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/04/27/the-question-of-ceos-role-in-blogging/#comment-506</guid>
		<description>A provocative question, the CEO-blogger, given top executives' historically slow adapatation to new technologies -- though I strongly suspect that up-and-coming CEOs today are far less intimidated by, and reluctant to engage, new communications technologies (particularly given the changing "instantaneous" marketplace environment).

Anders Gronstedt's comment in HBR shows an enlightened top dog, to be sure.  But he's, of course, right: CEOs remain on the sideline of ongoing cyber-discourse at their own, and their organization's, risk.  Probably best to view the blog as a new and emerging opportunity to communicate -- directly, and unfiltered -- with key constituencies (especially some, like critics, who aren't apt to want to listen via traditional media).  However, the CEO's voice is unlike any other, carries the enormous weight of policy and ultimate decisiveness (not to mention "insider" status), and thus, a top executive must take care with not only what he/she says, but also how, how much and when.  To who is irrelevant, since it's a public forum and available to any and all.  And I would expect that a CEO's comments will attract strong reactions from many quarters, both supportive, opposing and otherwise.  In other words, when "the" top individual talks in such a conversational manner as happens on a blog, Pandora's box is likely to open -- definitely good, possibly not, but certainly a "bigger deal" for the CEO and the organization compared to almost any other voice.

Should the CEO consult, and involve, his/her top communication professional BEFORE posting a blog comment?  Hmmmmm, an intriguing question, don't you think?  Nothing in this world of communication is as simple as it seems . . . JDP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A provocative question, the CEO-blogger, given top executives&#8217; historically slow adapatation to new technologies &#8212; though I strongly suspect that up-and-coming CEOs today are far less intimidated by, and reluctant to engage, new communications technologies (particularly given the changing &#8220;instantaneous&#8221; marketplace environment).</p>
<p>Anders Gronstedt&#8217;s comment in HBR shows an enlightened top dog, to be sure.  But he&#8217;s, of course, right: CEOs remain on the sideline of ongoing cyber-discourse at their own, and their organization&#8217;s, risk.  Probably best to view the blog as a new and emerging opportunity to communicate &#8212; directly, and unfiltered &#8212; with key constituencies (especially some, like critics, who aren&#8217;t apt to want to listen via traditional media).  However, the CEO&#8217;s voice is unlike any other, carries the enormous weight of policy and ultimate decisiveness (not to mention &#8220;insider&#8221; status), and thus, a top executive must take care with not only what he/she says, but also how, how much and when.  To who is irrelevant, since it&#8217;s a public forum and available to any and all.  And I would expect that a CEO&#8217;s comments will attract strong reactions from many quarters, both supportive, opposing and otherwise.  In other words, when &#8220;the&#8221; top individual talks in such a conversational manner as happens on a blog, Pandora&#8217;s box is likely to open &#8212; definitely good, possibly not, but certainly a &#8220;bigger deal&#8221; for the CEO and the organization compared to almost any other voice.</p>
<p>Should the CEO consult, and involve, his/her top communication professional BEFORE posting a blog comment?  Hmmmmm, an intriguing question, don&#8217;t you think?  Nothing in this world of communication is as simple as it seems . . . JDP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication Measurement 101 by Don Stacks</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Stacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Go to the Institute for Public Relations website.  I'd download the Dictionary of Public Relations Measurement and Research first and then go to Amazon.com and read Primer of Public Relations Research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go to the Institute for Public Relations website.  I&#8217;d download the Dictionary of Public Relations Measurement and Research first and then go to <a href="http://Amazon.com" title="http://Amazon.com" target="_blank">Amazon.com</a> and read Primer of Public Relations Research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication Measurement 101 by Robert J Holland, ABC</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert J Holland, ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Cheryl,

I wrote a manual about the practical aspects of communication measurement and would be glad to share the details offline (don't want to be perceived as "hawking my wares" in this forum -- but you did ask!). It includes a chapter about knowing how to ask the right questions in the right way.

Robert J Holland, ABC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl,</p>
<p>I wrote a manual about the practical aspects of communication measurement and would be glad to share the details offline (don&#8217;t want to be perceived as &#8220;hawking my wares&#8221; in this forum &#8212; but you did ask!). It includes a chapter about knowing how to ask the right questions in the right way.</p>
<p>Robert J Holland, ABC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication Measurement 101 by Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/16/communication-measurement-101/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I am trying to become "the measurement maven" (Angela's term) in our Corp. Comms. dept. I have a pretty good grasp of when to measure, what tools to use for various situations, etc. However, what I'm looking for are samples of surveys, how to word questions, and practical tips on measurement best practices. Does anyone have any suggestions of books, websites, etc.?

Thanks, Cheryl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am trying to become &#8220;the measurement maven&#8221; (Angela&#8217;s term) in our Corp. Comms. dept. I have a pretty good grasp of when to measure, what tools to use for various situations, etc. However, what I&#8217;m looking for are samples of surveys, how to word questions, and practical tips on measurement best practices. Does anyone have any suggestions of books, websites, etc.?</p>
<p>Thanks, Cheryl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who are the Brand Leaders? by Merrill Freund</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/08/who-are-the-brand-leaders/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrill Freund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 23:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/08/who-are-the-brand-leaders/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>The NFL is among the greatest, sustained branding campaigns of all time. Under the leadership of comissioners Pete Rozelle and Paul Tagliabue, the league has managed to convince 30 millionaire, hyper competitive owners that the league is only as strong as the weakest team. From equal distribution of television revenue, regardless of the team's market size, to the creation of NFL Films to market teams individually and the league as a whole, to centrally driven merchandising programs, the NFL is a model of how to create a broad brand from which individual sub brands can flourish. Of course the Washington Redskins will always be its top shelf standard. Definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NFL is among the greatest, sustained branding campaigns of all time. Under the leadership of comissioners Pete Rozelle and Paul Tagliabue, the league has managed to convince 30 millionaire, hyper competitive owners that the league is only as strong as the weakest team. From equal distribution of television revenue, regardless of the team&#8217;s market size, to the creation of NFL Films to market teams individually and the league as a whole, to centrally driven merchandising programs, the NFL is a model of how to create a broad brand from which individual sub brands can flourish. Of course the Washington Redskins will always be its top shelf standard. Definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who are the Brand Leaders? by Natasha Spring</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/08/who-are-the-brand-leaders/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Spring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/08/who-are-the-brand-leaders/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>I've heard of Tim Hortan's -- even here in California. They are looking at expanding to have about 500 Tim Hortons locations in the US sometime in 2007 and have already made some in-roads. The fact that have those yummy donuts will not be a shoe-in though --consider the current state of Krispy Creme. People loved them until they come to their senses.

Anyway, if anyone wants to read more about branding and Tim Horton's, take a look at this the article Tim Horton's: Power Play on Branding.com:

http://www.brandchannel.com/features_profile.asp?pr_id=253</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard of Tim Hortan&#8217;s &#8212; even here in California. They are looking at expanding to have about 500 Tim Hortons locations in the US sometime in 2007 and have already made some in-roads. The fact that have those yummy donuts will not be a shoe-in though &#8211;consider the current state of Krispy Creme. People loved them until they come to their senses.</p>
<p>Anyway, if anyone wants to read more about branding and Tim Horton&#8217;s, take a look at this the article Tim Horton&#8217;s: Power Play on <a href="http://Branding.com" title="http://Branding.com" target="_blank">Branding.com</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/features_profile.asp?pr_id=253" rel="nofollow">http://www.brandchannel.com/features_profile.asp?pr_id=253</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who are the Brand Leaders? by Tim Hicks, lapsed ABC</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/08/who-are-the-brand-leaders/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hicks, lapsed ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/03/08/who-are-the-brand-leaders/#comment-88</guid>
		<description>In Canada, Tim Hortons (sic) is doing a terrific job of branding. They have established themselves as Canada's coffee shop for the common man (leaving Starbucks to what Homer Simpson once called the latte-sucking popinjays). 

The stores (known as Tims or T-Ho) have a consistent look; they advertise heavily and consistently with a family-values theme. They often get free media coverage by supplying coffee to our troops overseas and doing a long-running R-r-r-roll Up The Rim To Win contest. 

Many claim the coffee is the best. I think it's nasty. 
The donuts are quite good, if you like deep-fried cake.
Their "Timbits"  - called donut holes in other places - are ubiquitous, and a box of them is often is plain view for hours in the average workplace office. 

They're dominant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Canada, Tim Hortons (sic) is doing a terrific job of branding. They have established themselves as Canada&#8217;s coffee shop for the common man (leaving Starbucks to what Homer Simpson once called the latte-sucking popinjays). </p>
<p>The stores (known as Tims or T-Ho) have a consistent look; they advertise heavily and consistently with a family-values theme. They often get free media coverage by supplying coffee to our troops overseas and doing a long-running R-r-r-roll Up The Rim To Win contest. </p>
<p>Many claim the coffee is the best. I think it&#8217;s nasty.<br />
The donuts are quite good, if you like deep-fried cake.<br />
Their &#8220;Timbits&#8221;  - called donut holes in other places - are ubiquitous, and a box of them is often is plain view for hours in the average workplace office. </p>
<p>They&#8217;re dominant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Some additional background on the Commons by Warren Bickford, ABC</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/2006/02/18/12/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Bickford, ABC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/2006/02/18/12/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Couldn't agree with you more, Ian. Just happy that IABC is helping to facilitate the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more, Ian. Just happy that IABC is helping to facilitate the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
