<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for IABC Employee Communication Commons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commons.iabc.com/employee/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee</link>
	<description>A Blog Community for Business Communicators</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Do employees and bosses really want to be &#8220;friends&#8221;? by Mike Klein</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/07/10/do-employees-and-bosses-really-want-to-be-friends/#comment-13274</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/07/10/do-employees-and-bosses-really-want-to-be-friends/#comment-13274</guid>
		<description>I think it really depends on the relationship.  

I'd happily be Facebook buddies with my current managers, but I would prefer to be boiled in hydrochloric acid than to have that kind of exposure to one of my more troublesome recent bosses. 

Still, I'd hate to see this become some kind of a broad-brush taboo like office dating has become in some circles.

Mike Klein
The Hague, NL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it really depends on the relationship.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d happily be Facebook buddies with my current managers, but I would prefer to be boiled in hydrochloric acid than to have that kind of exposure to one of my more troublesome recent bosses. </p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d hate to see this become some kind of a broad-brush taboo like office dating has become in some circles.</p>
<p>Mike Klein<br />
The Hague, NL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do employees and bosses really want to be &#8220;friends&#8221;? by Amy</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/07/10/do-employees-and-bosses-really-want-to-be-friends/#comment-13273</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/07/10/do-employees-and-bosses-really-want-to-be-friends/#comment-13273</guid>
		<description>Hi, Julie. Great to see you contributing!! I've seen something similar on LinkedIn, where a boss who has actually almost fired a certain person was also one of that person's recommendations on the LinkedIn site. If someone - at any level - asks you for an endorsement or vote or whatever we want to call requests for recommendation or friendship, it's almost churlish not to say OK. I wonder if it will lead to people having two personas -- a public one for bosses and acquaintences, and a super-private one for true friends only. If so, that's going to be hard to manage; I can hardly keep straight all my PINS and passwords, much less being a public persona and a private persona at the same time. - Amy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Julie. Great to see you contributing!! I&#8217;ve seen something similar on LinkedIn, where a boss who has actually almost fired a certain person was also one of that person&#8217;s recommendations on the LinkedIn site. If someone - at any level - asks you for an endorsement or vote or whatever we want to call requests for recommendation or friendship, it&#8217;s almost churlish not to say OK. I wonder if it will lead to people having two personas &#8212; a public one for bosses and acquaintences, and a super-private one for true friends only. If so, that&#8217;s going to be hard to manage; I can hardly keep straight all my PINS and passwords, much less being a public persona and a private persona at the same time. - Amy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do employees and bosses really want to be &#8220;friends&#8221;? by Eirene</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/07/10/do-employees-and-bosses-really-want-to-be-friends/#comment-13272</link>
		<dc:creator>Eirene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/07/10/do-employees-and-bosses-really-want-to-be-friends/#comment-13272</guid>
		<description>It is not a good idea to mix personal and professional lives. The problem is many people have not learned to carry over real-world common-sense, office etiquette, and professional behavior to the Internet.

I suggest that people whose careers can benefit from networking on sites such as Facebook or profession related forums keep a professional persona. As an outlet for fun and more socializing, participate in other website forums and social networking sites--and do not mix the, too. Be careful about how much information (especially personal information) that you provide on the internet, period. Too many people, reveal participation in other websites (IM address, webpages, photo sites) that makes it easy to figure out one's identity, which renders a screen name useless.
People should designate specific sites and forums for business and others for pleasure or play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not a good idea to mix personal and professional lives. The problem is many people have not learned to carry over real-world common-sense, office etiquette, and professional behavior to the Internet.</p>
<p>I suggest that people whose careers can benefit from networking on sites such as Facebook or profession related forums keep a professional persona. As an outlet for fun and more socializing, participate in other website forums and social networking sites&#8211;and do not mix the, too. Be careful about how much information (especially personal information) that you provide on the internet, period. Too many people, reveal participation in other websites (IM address, webpages, photo sites) that makes it easy to figure out one&#8217;s identity, which renders a screen name useless.<br />
People should designate specific sites and forums for business and others for pleasure or play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A hole in the head by lmore</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/06/08/a-hole-in-the-head/#comment-13271</link>
		<dc:creator>lmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 19:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/06/08/a-hole-in-the-head/#comment-13271</guid>
		<description>Seems a bit draconian to me. A person's outward appearance doesn't always belie the person's competency, initiative, and character. Any company that still uses this as some kind of measure of corporate culture acceptance should probably institute office uniforms if they want to achieve visual monotony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems a bit draconian to me. A person&#8217;s outward appearance doesn&#8217;t always belie the person&#8217;s competency, initiative, and character. Any company that still uses this as some kind of measure of corporate culture acceptance should probably institute office uniforms if they want to achieve visual monotony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A hole in the head by Wilma Mathews</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/06/08/a-hole-in-the-head/#comment-13270</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilma Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/06/08/a-hole-in-the-head/#comment-13270</guid>
		<description>Pat,

Funny you should mention this. I've been thinking lately about the many new and unusal forms of communication--most of which I don't like but at least understand their value to their particular audiences.
Tagging (also known as graffiti) is a form of communication that marks territories, gives the tagger a sense of achievement/purpose and costs taxpayers a lot of money to remove. Tagging increases during the summer months when kids aren't in school and get bored with "nothing to do." But, similar to the need for texting, tagging says: "I EXIST!!"
Tattoos also are communication, self-identification, symbols of self-worth, messages about life styles and loved ones. Their permanence bothers me because I think there are some people who would like to have an eraser when they wake up the next morning -- or when they turn 50 and wonder why the hell they did it.
Piercings have a place in there somewhere -- I'm just not sure where. Pierced ears started out as adornment and now -- at its most extreme -- communicate excess, lack of good judgement and an ability to (a) withstand the pain of creating new holes and (b) plenty of time to load up all those rings. 
So, yes, piercings and clothings say a lot about a person. I don't think we have the definitions in place yet to know what they say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat,</p>
<p>Funny you should mention this. I&#8217;ve been thinking lately about the many new and unusal forms of communication&#8211;most of which I don&#8217;t like but at least understand their value to their particular audiences.<br />
Tagging (also known as graffiti) is a form of communication that marks territories, gives the tagger a sense of achievement/purpose and costs taxpayers a lot of money to remove. Tagging increases during the summer months when kids aren&#8217;t in school and get bored with &#8220;nothing to do.&#8221; But, similar to the need for texting, tagging says: &#8220;I EXIST!!&#8221;<br />
Tattoos also are communication, self-identification, symbols of self-worth, messages about life styles and loved ones. Their permanence bothers me because I think there are some people who would like to have an eraser when they wake up the next morning &#8212; or when they turn 50 and wonder why the hell they did it.<br />
Piercings have a place in there somewhere &#8212; I&#8217;m just not sure where. Pierced ears started out as adornment and now &#8212; at its most extreme &#8212; communicate excess, lack of good judgement and an ability to (a) withstand the pain of creating new holes and (b) plenty of time to load up all those rings.<br />
So, yes, piercings and clothings say a lot about a person. I don&#8217;t think we have the definitions in place yet to know what they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A hole in the head by Liz</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/06/08/a-hole-in-the-head/#comment-13269</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/06/08/a-hole-in-the-head/#comment-13269</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, dress codes have long been a ripe area for a gender discrimination class action. In the case mentioned, why are women allowed 2 piercings per ear and men none? Begging the question, why are women are limited to two per ear? How is this policed? What if the two piercings per ear are in the daith and the tragus? What if you have six piercings but remore the earrings in excess of two per ear (or wear the "invisible" sort) before coming to work? Is the limit just on ear piercings and silent about eyebrow piercings and the like?

There is some line where a style of attire and grooming becomes a distraction in the workplace, but some common sense needs to applied here. And some fairness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, dress codes have long been a ripe area for a gender discrimination class action. In the case mentioned, why are women allowed 2 piercings per ear and men none? Begging the question, why are women are limited to two per ear? How is this policed? What if the two piercings per ear are in the daith and the tragus? What if you have six piercings but remore the earrings in excess of two per ear (or wear the &#8220;invisible&#8221; sort) before coming to work? Is the limit just on ear piercings and silent about eyebrow piercings and the like?</p>
<p>There is some line where a style of attire and grooming becomes a distraction in the workplace, but some common sense needs to applied here. And some fairness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Employee E-mail Surveillance by Tom Keefe</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/01/30/employee-e-mail-surveillance/#comment-13238</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2007/01/30/employee-e-mail-surveillance/#comment-13238</guid>
		<description>Seems that my previous post and link were truncated. I recently addressed this issue on my blog:
http://www.commakazispeek.com/blog/2007/03/09/were-frogs-in-a-pot/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that my previous post and link were truncated. I recently addressed this issue on my blog:<br />
<a href="http://www.commakazispeek.com/blog/2007/03/09/were-frogs-in-a-pot/" rel="nofollow">http://www.commakazispeek.com/blog/2007/03/09/were-frogs-in-a-pot/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The death of employee comms? Not yet&#8230; by Erika Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2006/08/28/the-death-of-employee-comms-not-yet/#comment-13172</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 21:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2006/08/28/the-death-of-employee-comms-not-yet/#comment-13172</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Shel, unfortunately Intranet is being used in some companies as the basis for communicating with employees without any strategy behind it.

As communicators, I think we should not loose the focuss first of all in the objectives we pursue with communications, which should be, at least amongst them, to increase or maintain a high level of engagement and belonging pride amongst employees.  So Intranet should be seen as one more communication medium within the internal communications strategy, and as the official source of information of the company available for everyone or even for groups with restricted access in some sections.

The way information is posted there should be in a different shape from how it is published in electronic screens or printed magazines and newsletters.  Every medium has specific guidelines for publication depending on the different types of audiences it is addressed to.

Intranet, as every other internal medium, should reflect the strategy and the objectives communications and the company are pursuing together, and it should be supported by other type of media like portals to talk to the CEO, teleconferences with him or town hall meetings.  Key messages should be present always in every publication in every internal medium.

Only with this alignment of key messages and strategy we could say that Intranet can really be a useful medium to contribute to achieve the communications goals, and then turn into a helpful tool rather than into our enemy or murderer.

Erika Ruiz

Erika Ruiz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Shel, unfortunately Intranet is being used in some companies as the basis for communicating with employees without any strategy behind it.</p>
<p>As communicators, I think we should not loose the focuss first of all in the objectives we pursue with communications, which should be, at least amongst them, to increase or maintain a high level of engagement and belonging pride amongst employees.  So Intranet should be seen as one more communication medium within the internal communications strategy, and as the official source of information of the company available for everyone or even for groups with restricted access in some sections.</p>
<p>The way information is posted there should be in a different shape from how it is published in electronic screens or printed magazines and newsletters.  Every medium has specific guidelines for publication depending on the different types of audiences it is addressed to.</p>
<p>Intranet, as every other internal medium, should reflect the strategy and the objectives communications and the company are pursuing together, and it should be supported by other type of media like portals to talk to the CEO, teleconferences with him or town hall meetings.  Key messages should be present always in every publication in every internal medium.</p>
<p>Only with this alignment of key messages and strategy we could say that Intranet can really be a useful medium to contribute to achieve the communications goals, and then turn into a helpful tool rather than into our enemy or murderer.</p>
<p>Erika Ruiz</p>
<p>Erika Ruiz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The death of employee comms? Not yet&#8230; by Mary Vanderwoude</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2006/08/28/the-death-of-employee-comms-not-yet/#comment-13160</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Vanderwoude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2006/08/28/the-death-of-employee-comms-not-yet/#comment-13160</guid>
		<description>No longer traffic cops or message police, can employee/internal communicators transform ourselves into information management gurus -- providing tools, guidelines and consultative services to our "clients"? Build the playground, put in the right equipment and a soft safe landing pad -- the rest is up to the "kids".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No longer traffic cops or message police, can employee/internal communicators transform ourselves into information management gurus &#8212; providing tools, guidelines and consultative services to our &#8220;clients&#8221;? Build the playground, put in the right equipment and a soft safe landing pad &#8212; the rest is up to the &#8220;kids&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Symbolic Communication by Erika Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2006/07/22/symbolic-communication/#comment-13153</link>
		<dc:creator>Erika Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/employee/2006/07/22/symbolic-communication/#comment-13153</guid>
		<description>Symbolic communication coming from high executives of the company is always a useful and powerful tool, especially when CEO or these high executives are new.

It is a way of letting employees know them and put themselves closer to them.

For example, I remember when my current CEO had just a few months in our company, during a meeting with sales force in a very warm place, he went out of the room and returned with a refrigerator full of beers for everyone.

He also began showing himself during corporate events or meetings with employees without a tie and dressed in a casual way.  That went perfectly well with his message of wanting to turn the company into a more dynamic and modern one.

He opened forums to talk to him directly through Intranet, telephone conferences and town hall meetings.

I think he did a very good job in taking his message across not ontly through what he said in formal communication channels, but also through this symbolic communication.

Erika</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Symbolic communication coming from high executives of the company is always a useful and powerful tool, especially when CEO or these high executives are new.</p>
<p>It is a way of letting employees know them and put themselves closer to them.</p>
<p>For example, I remember when my current CEO had just a few months in our company, during a meeting with sales force in a very warm place, he went out of the room and returned with a refrigerator full of beers for everyone.</p>
<p>He also began showing himself during corporate events or meetings with employees without a tie and dressed in a casual way.  That went perfectly well with his message of wanting to turn the company into a more dynamic and modern one.</p>
<p>He opened forums to talk to him directly through Intranet, telephone conferences and town hall meetings.</p>
<p>I think he did a very good job in taking his message across not ontly through what he said in formal communication channels, but also through this symbolic communication.</p>
<p>Erika</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
