<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mind the Gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/</link>
	<description>A Blog Community for Business Communicators</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angie Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Merry - it is mind-boggling.  We funded a study in 2004 for PR News on ascertaining attitudes toward measurement among corporate and agency types, and learned that 81% felt it was "important" or "very important," but only one out of five firms had a budget for it, and the average spend was 2.3% of the PR budget.  

As discouraging as that seems, we also noted that 42.3% claimed some measurement of outcomes, as opposed to just outputs, which was a big leap forward from a similar study we'd done two years prior.  So, slowly but surely ...

Angie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry - it is mind-boggling.  We funded a study in 2004 for PR News on ascertaining attitudes toward measurement among corporate and agency types, and learned that 81% felt it was &#8220;important&#8221; or &#8220;very important,&#8221; but only one out of five firms had a budget for it, and the average spend was 2.3% of the PR budget.  </p>
<p>As discouraging as that seems, we also noted that 42.3% claimed some measurement of outcomes, as opposed to just outputs, which was a big leap forward from a similar study we&#8217;d done two years prior.  So, slowly but surely &#8230;</p>
<p>Angie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merry Elrick</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Merry Elrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Yes Mark, I think you're right.  And on top of that, there's the usual resistance to change, plus a healthy does of fear that measurement will reveal our efforts aren't bringing in a good return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Mark, I think you&#8217;re right.  And on top of that, there&#8217;s the usual resistance to change, plus a healthy does of fear that measurement will reveal our efforts aren&#8217;t bringing in a good return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Weiner</title>
		<link>http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commons.iabc.com/measure/2006/04/08/mind-the-gap/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Merry,

You make a good point.  I think one reason there is a gap is that the senior executives who demand accountability don't know enough about marketing/PR to dictate exactly how this should be done, and the marketing/PR practicioners don't know enough about measurement to guide their executives.  The result is stasis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry,</p>
<p>You make a good point.  I think one reason there is a gap is that the senior executives who demand accountability don&#8217;t know enough about marketing/PR to dictate exactly how this should be done, and the marketing/PR practicioners don&#8217;t know enough about measurement to guide their executives.  The result is stasis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
